ALL Canadians!

ALL Canadians! On May 26, 2020, Robert McKinnon MP, will present a petition to the Federal government to remove dangerous cell towers away from children’s schools across Canada. If Canadians don’t sign where it counts right now, millions of children will be exposed to unnecessary radiation from cell towers and antennas while at school and in playgrounds. The more signatures, the greater chance at success. Your friends and family, neighbors and co-workers as well as your children, can all sign this legal petition with a valid email address. Don’t wait until it’s too late!

Petition e-2424 – Petitions

Spread the love

8 Responses

  • Why I cannot support this and won’t promote it?

    Because it says:

    “Update Safety Code 6 to restrict the installation of cellular towers/antennas within 305m of all schools and playgrounds; and”

    All nice and sweet BUT!… There are numerous epidemiological studies showing much higher than normal incidence of cancer within a 400 meter radius of cell towers, as well as lots of other health effects within 1 Km.

    The Influence of Being Physically Near to a Cell Phone Transmission Mast on the Incidence of Cancer

    The result of the study shows that the proportion of newly developing cancer cases was significantly higher among those patients who had lived during the past ten years at a distance of up to 400 metres from the cellular transmitter site, which has been in operation since 1993, compared to those patients living further away, and that the patients fell ill on average 8 years earlier. In the years 1999-2004, ie after five years’ operation of the transmitting installation, the relative risk of getting cancer had trebled for the residents of the area in the proximity of the installation compared to the inhabitants of Naila outside the area.

    “Epidemiological and survey studies find cancer & other health issues near TV and radio broadcasting towers in addition to cell towers. One of the latest high profile cases is the court-ordered epidemiological study for the Vatican radio tower and cancer. Increased risks of cancer were reported within a 5.5 mile radius. This large radius can be explained by the higher output power of radio/TV towers. In contrast, the critical range for a cell tower is usually within 400 meters.”

    – Taken from IRRADIATED (p. 16)

    “…many neighborhoods have cell phone antenna towers radiating 24/7, within different zones: the deadly zone 150 meter (492’) radius from the tower, the dark zone 500 meter (1640’) radius, and there are some adverse effects as far out as 1000 meters, (8)”

    – Taken from IRRADIATED (p. 110)

    See also : Fact Sheet on Cell Tower Health Studies

    Cell Tower Dangers

    Compilation Of Research Studies On Cell Tower Radiation And Health

    (…) Given the current research, cell towers should be cautiously placed 500 meters, or about a third of a mile, away from schools, hospitals and lots of sleeping people in dense neighborhoods or high rises.

    305m is inadequate.

    To me this goes to show why using the federal governement system can be counterproductive.

    Because someone proposed this distance as being safe – or one of the clerks of the petition system amended it (because they can… you have no control over the final version of any petition posted there) or the MP himself decided that 305 m is safe — when it will be read to the Parliament, if the MPs pay attention, they will remember that 305 meter (a thousand feet) is a safe distance, no matter the power output of the antennas (often many if not dozens) facing a school (Rogers’ transmitters have a power output that is often over 3000 watts while those of other telecoms are often of a much lower power wattage) and no matter the type of generation or their combination. And not a word about the powerful WiFi emitters within the schools and the cumuliative exposure within classrooms when all students download a video at the same time.

    Another issue with these petitions is that because of the very small number of words allowed and the request that only one or 2 demands are made, they cannot inherently address complex problems that require many concurrent demands to fix them.

    And of course beside a non-committal written statement from a minister in response to a petition IF it is finally read in the Hall of Commons, the government isn’t in any way required to do anything about it. And yet they can claim that the matter has already been addressed with a proper response.

    • Holly fuk man you are def. Right can I copy and paste some of your text and put it on my 5G protest page because you on facebook? .. . . . You are soo right man! I didnt read it properly and signed it thinking it was against all 5G towers. There is no benefits to that kind of radiation only dangers.

      On june 6 2020 we are organising a world wide non-violent and legal protest I live in Ottawa /Gatineau so I would like to use some of your facts. I will even quote you .

  • It’s disgraceful,them towers need to come down ASAP,bring back hanging,trump is coming,and hell is coming with him.i hope he hangs the lot of you

  • We def need the people to push back against against laws that take our freedom of choice away from us this can only lead to destruction of humanity

  • Thanks for all your work. This is a good start. Of course if 5G towers take off, with thousands of satellites overhead, there will be no escape, the world will be blanketed in a field of radiation with nowhere to hide. A dismal thought, but people ARE beginning to wake up …more work to do !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *